• Nebyly nalezeny žádné výsledky

A Bound for Size Ramsey Numbers of Multi-partite Graphs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Podíl "A Bound for Size Ramsey Numbers of Multi-partite Graphs"

Copied!
5
0
0

Načítání.... (zobrazit plný text nyní)

Fulltext

(1)

A Bound for Size Ramsey Numbers of Multi-partite Graphs

Yuqin Sun and Yusheng Li

Department of Mathematics, Tongji University Shanghai 200092, P. R. China

xxteachersyq@163.com, li yusheng@mail.tongji.edu.cn

Submitted: Sep 28, 2006; Accepted: Jun 8, 2007; Published: Jun 14, 2007 Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C55

Abstract

It is shown that the (diagonal) size Ramsey numbers of complete m-partite graphs Km(n) can be bounded from below by cn22(m−1)n, where c is a positive constant.

Key words: Size Ramsey number, Complete multi-partite graph

1 Introduction

Let G,G1 and G2 be simple graphs with at least two vertices, and let G→(G1, G2)

signify that in any edge-coloring of edge set E(G) of G in red and blue, there is either a monochromatic red G1 or a monochromatic blue G2. With this notation, the Ramsey number r(G1, G2) can be defined as

r(G1, G2) = min{N :KN →(G1, G2)}

= min{|V(G)|:G→(G1, G2)}.

As the number of edges of a graph is often called the size of the graph, Erd˝os, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp [2] introduced an idea of measuring minimality with respect to size rather than order of the graphs G with G→(G1, G2). Let e(G) be the number of edges of G. Then the size Ramsey numberr(Gˆ 1, G2) is defined as

ˆ

r(G1, G2) = min{e(G) :G→(G1, G2)}.

Supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China.

(2)

As usual, we write ˆr(G, G) as ˆr(G). Erd˝os and Rousseau in [3] showed ˆ

r(Kn,n)> 1

60n22n. (1)

Gorgol [4] gave

ˆ

r(Km(n))> cn22mn/2, (2) where and henceforth Km(n) is a complete m-partite graph with n vertices in each part, and c >0 is a constant. Bielak [1] gave

ˆ

r(Kn,n,n)> cnn222n, (3) where cn4e318//33 asn → ∞. We shall generalize (1) and (3) by improving (2) as

ˆ

r(Km(n))> cn22(m−1)n, where c=cm >0 that has a positive limit as n→ ∞.

2 Main results

We need an upper bound for the number of subgraphs isomorphic toKm(n) in a graph of given size. The following counting lemma generalizes a result of Erd˝os and Rousseau [3]

and we made a minor improvement for the case m = 2.

Lemma 1 Let n ≥ 2 be an integer. A graph with q edges contains at most A(m, n, q) copies of complete m-partite graph Km(n), where

A(m, n, q) = 2eq (m−1)m!n

2e2q n2

!mn/22m−2 m

(m−2)n/2

.

Proof. Let F denote Km(n) and let G be a graph of q edges on vertex setV. Set s =

&

e(F)

2 log 2q e(F)

'

,

where logx is the natural logarithmic function. Set ds+1 =∞and dk= (m−1)nek/e(F), k= 0,1,2,· · ·, s, and

Xk ={x∈V :dk≤deg(x)< dk+1}.

Then X0, X1, . . . , Xs form a partition of the set W0 ={x∈V : deg(x)≥(m−1)n}. Let Wk =∪sj=kXj ={x∈V : deg(x)≥dk}.

Let us say that a subgraph F in G is of type k if k is the smallest index such that Xk∩V(F)6=φ. Then

(3)

• every vertex ofV(F) belongs to Wk;

• at least one vertex of V(F) belongs to Xk.

Let Mk be the number of type k copies of F in G. Then M = Psk=0Mk is the total number of copies of F. Notice that in a type k copy of F at least one vertex, say x, belongs to Xk and every vertex belongs to Wk. Thus all F−neighbors of x belong to an (m−1)n-element subsetY of theG−neighborhood ofxinWk. Moreover all other (n−1) vertices ofF belong to an (n−1)-element subset ofWk−Y−{x}. Since the neighborhood of x inF is a complete (m−1)-partite graph, say H, then we get at most

t(m, n) = 1 (m−1)!

(m−1)n n

! (m−2)n n

!

· · · 2n n

! n n

!

subgraphs isomorphic toH in the graph induced by the set Y. Furthermore, them parts in Km(n) can be interchanged arbitrarily. Note that a vertex x∈Xk has degree at most dk+1, so

Mk≤ |Xk|t(m, n) m

bdk+1c (m−1)n

! |Wk| n

!

. The elementary formulas

D t

! t n

!

= D

n

! D−n t−n

!

and D

n

!

≤ Dn n! <

eD n

n

give

bdk+1c (m−1)n

! (m−1)n n

! (m−2)n n

!

· · · 2n n

!

≤ bdk+1c n

! bdk+1c −(m−1)n (m−2)n

! (m−2)n n

!

· · · 2n n

!

≤ bdk+1c n

! bdk+1c (m−2)n

! (m−2)n n

!

· · · 2n n

!

≤ bdk+1c n

!m−1

≤ edk+1 n

!(m−1)n

.

It implies that fork = 0,1,2, . . . , s−1,

Mk ≤ |Xk| m!

edk+1

n

!m−1

e|Wk| n

n

≤ |Xk| m!

em n2

dk+1

n

!m−2

dk+1|Wk|

n

.

(4)

From the definition of Wk, we have dk|Wk| ≤2q. Hence dk+1|Wk|=dk|Wk|e1/e(F) ≤2qe1/e(F), and dk+1/n= (m−1)e(k+1)/e(F), so

Mk≤ |Xk| m!

2qem(m−1)m−2

n2 exp (m−2)k+m−1 e(F)

!!n

.

As k ≤s−1≤ e(F2)loge(F2q) and e(F) = m(m−1)n2/2,

exp (m−2)k+m−1 e(F)

!

≤e2/(mn2) 4q m(m−1)n2

!(m−2)/2

,

and hence

Mk ≤ e|Xk|

m! · 2e2q n2

!mn/22m−2 m

(m−2)n/2

.

Since ds ≥ 2e−1/e(F)q(m−1)q/m, so |Xs| = |Ws| ≤ e1/e(F)qmq/(m−1), and if the subgraph F is of type s, then each vertex ofV(F) must belong to Xs. Thus we have

Ms ≤ t(m, n) m

|Xs| (m−1)n

! |Xs| n

!

< 1 m!

|Xs| n

!m

≤ e m!

2e2q n2

!mn/2 m 2m−2

mn/2

.

If |Xs|= 0 then |Ms|= 0; thus we can write Ms≤ e|Xs|

m!

2e2q n2

!mn/2 m 2m−2

mn/2

.

Hence for all k = 0,1, . . . , s, we have Mk ≤ e|Xk|

m!

2e2q n2

!mn/22m−2 m

(m−2)n/2

.

Finally, we obtain M =

s

X

k=0

Mk ≤ |W0| · e m!

2e2q n2

!mn/22m−2 m

(m−2)n/2

≤ 2eq

n(m−1)m!

2e2q n2

!mn/22m−2 m

(m−2)n/2

. The assertion follows.

(5)

Theorem 1 Let m≥2 be fixed and n→ ∞, then ˆ

r(Km(n))>(c−o(1))n22(m−1)n, where c= 16e2(m−1)m 4m−4m 2/m.

Proof. We shall prove that ˆ

r(Km(n))> c(m, n)n22(m−1)n, where

c(m, n) = m 16e2(m−1)

4m−4 m

2/m (m−1)m!

4en

!2/(mn)

.

Let G be arbitrary graph with q edges, where q ≤ c(m, n)n22(m−1)n. Let us consider a random red-blue edge-coloring of G, in which each edge is red with probability 1/2 and the edges are colored independently. Then the probability P that such a random coloring yields a monochromatic copy of Km(n) satisfies

P ≤ 4eq

n(m−1)m!

2e2q n2

!mn/22m−2 m

(m−2)n/21 2

m(m−1)n2/2

< 4en22(m−1)n

n(m−1)m!(2e2)mn/2

2m−2 m

(m−2)n/2

cmn/2 = 1.

Thus G 6→ (Km(n), Km(n)), and the desired lower bound follows from the fact that c(m, n)→cas n→ ∞.

References

[1] H. Bielak, Size Ramsey numbers for some regular graphs,Electronic Notes in Discrete Math. 24 (2006), 39–45.

[2] P. Erd˝os, R. Faudree, C. Rousseau and R. Schelp, The size Ramsey numbers, Period.

Math. Hungar. 9 (1978) 145–161.

[3] P. Erd˝os and C. Rousseau, The size Ramsey number of a complete bipartite graph, Discrete Math. 113 (1993), 259–262.

[4] I. Gorgol, On bounds for size Ramsey numbers of a complete tripartite graph,Discrete Math. 164 (1997), 149–153.

Odkazy

Související dokumenty

Theorem 5.1 The numbers a n of simple 21-free graphs of size n are the same as those of noncrossing graphs in Theorem 4.2 and the GF is given by equation (8).. The numbers v n of

Can we treat lower bound for information i P (τ ) individually for some τ , similarly as size lower bounds are (often) individual. Size lower bounds for P are used in proof

Sidorov, Unique representations of real numbers in noninteger bases, Math.. Kac, Statistical independence in probability, analysis and

Show that we can insert ten digits to the decimal representations of the two original numbers to obtain identical numbers..

This model thus predicts numbers of native and alien species (i.e. NAR) as a function of community size (number of individuals), sizes of both species pools and the parameters of

Reduced-Form and Instrumental Variables Estimates for 1991 The reduced-form relationship between predicted class size ( f sc ) and actual class size, reported in Table III for a

We focus on the minimum object size such that the appropri- ate Ramsey-type theorem holds, called Ramsey number , and on the minimum object size such that the first player has a

• For the negative base numeration system, we can derive from Theorem 6 that every Pisot number is an Ito-Sadahiro number. Thus we expect that.. For his proof it was important that