• Nebyly nalezeny žádné výsledky

REVIEWER’S FORM for thesis evaluation Erasmus Mundus Programme ADVANCED MASTERS IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Podíl "REVIEWER’S FORM for thesis evaluation Erasmus Mundus Programme ADVANCED MASTERS IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS 1"

Copied!
3
0
0

Načítání.... (zobrazit plný text nyní)

Fulltext

(1)

REVIEWER’S FORM for thesis evaluation

Erasmus Mundus Programme

ADVANCED MASTERS IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS 1 1. Identification of the student

Student: Lavina Jain

Thesis: Determination of component ratio in a historic lime-based mortar 1st Institution: University of Minho

2nd Institution: Czech Technical University in Prague Academic year: 2017/2018

2. Identification of the reviewer

Name: Cristiana Nunes

Institution: Ústav teoretické a aplikované mechaniky AV ČR, v. v. i.

Position: researcher

3. Fulfillment of thesis goals

excellent  above aver.  average x below aver.  weak  The aims of the thesis have generally been achieved. The work provides new results on the accuracy of common methods used to determine the composition of historic mortars and lists general advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Samples of known composition collected from flooring mortars with one year of age prepared based on ancient recipes were used as the case study. The wide range of materials that compose the multi- layered floors and the gradual reduction of the size of aggregates of each layer towards the surface are of particular interest for achieving the proposed goals. This aspect could have been highlighted in the introduction.

(2)

REVIEWER’S FORM for thesis evaluation

Erasmus Mundus Programme

ADVANCED MASTERS IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS 2 4. Academic/scientific/technical quality

excellent  above aver.  average x below aver.  weak  The study is interesting and the experimental work is thorough and competent, but there are a few issues that reduce the quality of the work. The state-of-the-art is weak. Long citations could have been replaced by a synthesis of the information. The preparation and structure of ancient floors are described, but the definition of the Latin terms used further for referring to each layer such as statumen and rudus are missing. A literature review on methods and standards/recommendations used for determining the composition of mortars would be most important since the aim of the thesis was “to study selected analytical methods used for the determination of binder to aggregate ratio (...).”

As a result, the discussion lacks a comparison of the thesis’ findings with those from other studies.

The choice for the sequential implementation of the used methods should have been justified. The experimental work is initiated with acid dissolution of the mortar samples, but it would be more logical to begin with the microscopic analysis, which can give an overview of the composition of the mortars and guide in the selection of other analytical methods, e.g., identify the type of aggregate to find out whether it is soluble in the used acids.

5. Formal arrangement of the thesis and level of language

excellent  above aver.  average x below aver.  weak  The main sections of the thesis are sufficiently organized, but there are some issues with the contents.

The introduction should have been more focused on the motivation, scope, and outline of the thesis;

there is text in the introduction that belongs to the state-of-the-art. The state-of-the-art should have been organized as to include all relevant information.

There are several language errors (mainly grammar and sentence structure) that significantly affect the clarity of the text. The reference style used in the Reference section is not always consistent, and most of the listed references are missing data. There are several pictures taken from literature without a reference. Figures and tables should always be mentioned in the text before they appear.

Recommendations for future work are missing.

6. Further comments

(3)

REVIEWER’S FORM for thesis evaluation

Erasmus Mundus Programme

ADVANCED MASTERS IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS 3

7.

Grade: __________D___________

Use the following scale

A (excellent) B (very good) C (good) D (satisfactory) E (sufficient) F (fail)

In Prague July 16, 2018

The Reviewer,

________________________

(Cristiana Lara Paulos Nunes)

Odkazy

Související dokumenty

The second chapter of the thesis contains the literature review on the existing works of the topic AI in PM. Both, academic and professional sources are reviewed for this thesis.

Figure 71- Optical microscope image in plane polarized light of thin section of specimens 4-6 and 4-1 showing the matrix with pores and grain distribution. View field: 6

ADVANCED MASTERS IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS 3 The

Jonathan Knudtsen’s Master’s thesis was to apply and critically compare different approaches to modelling and analysis of masonry arch bridges.. The calculations were to be

A recent experimental research carried out at ITAM provided the possibility to study samples of mortars made as copies of historic floor structures.. This “reverse

I agree that the research of the best practices is important, but the main goal of the thesis was to create experimental prototype, so I would expect that most of the thesis will

Results and discussion on page 29: “The excellent flexural behavior of the Product C is remarkable, and due to the high values gives in the four first levels

Luisa Natalia Peña Leal proved to be a reliable and hard working professional who is capable to complete specific tasks related to the testing and analysis of historic structures