Matematicko-fyzikálny časopis
Pavel Bartoš; Josef Kaucký
Additional Note to our Paper 'A Genesis for Combinatorial Identities'
Matematicko-fyzikálny časopis, Vol. 16 (1966), No. 3, 282--284 Persistent URL:http://dml.cz/dmlcz/126620
Terms of use:
© Mathematical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, 1966
Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain theseTerms of use.
This paper has been digitized, optimized for electronic delivery and stamped with digital signature within the projectDML-CZ: The Czech Digital Mathematics Libraryhttp://project.dml.cz
MATEMATICKO-FYZIKALNY ČASOPIS SAV, Ifi. 3, 1006
ADDITIONAL NOTE TO OUR PAPER
„A GENESIS FOR COMBINATORIAL IDENTITIES"
PAVEL BARTOS, JOSFF KAUCKY, Bratislava
In the paper [1] we have described a certain method by means of which we can derive some combinatorial formulas. In this note we introduce another similar method.
T h e o r e m. Let n be a natural number, x an arbitrary coynplex number and d\, et2, ..., (in, O+fi the given distinct complex numbers, with the condition ak — a,k-n-\ for k > n + I. Then the, following relation holds
(x + at)(x + ai41) ... (x + ai.n^i) (at - at A)(auri — (H-i) • • • (o-t v,i i -- n+i)
Proof. (1) is an algebraic equation of degree n in v. But it lias (n -- 1) roots
(2) —-tfi, — a2 j ..., a a , —«-,Mi.
Therefore it is an identity.
In fact the factor (x + ak), k ^ T, 2, ...,n, (n + 1) occurs in all members on the left side of this equation except in member with i k -[-- 1. rrhus for x •— —ak only the member
(—d k + <lk-\ l)(—(*-k + «>k\2) • • • (—(lk f dk,n)
(ak 11 -- ak)(ak] 2 — ak) ... (ak „ —- ak) is different from zero.
E x a m p l e . Let a\ — i. In this case equation (1) gives
(x + l)(x + 2)...(x + n) (x + 2)(x + 3) ... (x -| /j i 1) ( ^ [ - ( „ „ ^ . . . ( - ^ ( - l ) 1.2
ЗҢa; + 4 ) . . . (aH- » + 1) Ј- t I , (,r -|- 4)(
1.2 (n --- 1) I 1.2
+
(aLt
3)i? +
4 )•••
(;r+
и 4'
! )-
Ј'
f' •.
(,ť''"
4 ) (+
5 )••• <•"' f"" -
l )2 8 2
(4)
(x + l)(x +2) x + n + 1 ( - l ) ( - 2 ) ' • •+ 1 (x+ l)(x + 2) . . . (x + re — 1)
\-(n - 1)] [— (n - 2)] . . . (—2)(—1) "
(x -j- k
£ - 0
In virtue of identity
ЂM**- +l ){'
k 1.(«)
we have therefrom
x + n + 1\ lx + k\ __ íx + n + 1\ ln\ n + 1
n-k ) \ k ) ~ \ n+1 )\k)~~~~~~
(«)
2«-"',TíTi(í-[C::í>
k--0+, >r
This is a generalisation of the well-known relation
(^)
Уl-D*—
1..- M____-
/ , n + k+ 1 ЏJ (2n + 1)
k 0
See [2J.
R e m a r k . Let us only remark that the identity (4) can be obtained in
n
another with the aid of Cauchy's identity *S (fy ( y \ = (* + y)
k 0
w 1 ^ ; ; ) ^ J . + » + .-o,.. + 1 , ) .2(-:»r)(- T 1 )-
283
KEFKRENCVS
J l | Bartoš I\, Ivane ký J., A (jenesis for comhinatorial identities. Mat.-ty/, časop. M {\\m\), 3 1 -4 0 .
[21 T i i n i n I \ , Probléme 51. Mat. lapok 7 (\\)W), 141.
K r c c i w d J u n e 2, HM>5:
in iv\ iscd 1'orm, J u l y 2(>. I9(>5.
ČSAV, Matonatickfi ústan Slorenskej akademie ricfl,
H)'atislara
284