__ Please tick the evaluation of your choice
* Should you need more space, please use the rear side of this form
Report of the master thesis supervisor
Master thesis title:
Academic Base station
Name and surname of the student:
Bc. Aziz Zagroz
Name and surname of the bachelor thesis opponent (incl. academic degrees and company):
Ing. Robert Bestak PhD, CTU-FEE, Department of telecommunication engineering
1) Autonomy in work: 5) Professional level:
__ excellent __ very good _X_ good
__ satisfactory __ sufficient __ fail
__ excellent __ very good _X_ good
__ satisfactory __ sufficient __ fail
2) Systematic work: 6) Language and text level:
__ excellent __ very good _X_ good
__ satisfactory __ sufficient __ fail
__ excellent __ very good __ good
_X_ satisfactory __ sufficient __ fail
3) Theoretical knowledge: 7) Graphical form:
__ excellent __ very good _X_ good
__ satisfactory __ sufficient __ fail
__ excellent _X_ very good ___ good
__ satisfactory __ sufficient __ fail 4) Experimental skill*: 8) Student has met the assignment:
__ excellent _X_ very good __ good
__ satisfactory __ sufficient __ fail
_X_ completely __ partly __ not at all
9) Obtained results, own contribution, practical usability of the delivered work*:
In collaboration with Satakunta University of Applied Sciences in Finland, the student connects a GSM base station placed at CTU- FEE to a mobile network test-bed that is built in Finland. The established interconnection was then tested from the point of voice and data communication. The implemented remote base station will be used in the education process of KME program.
10) Remarks*:
I have comments regarding to language level, there are several grammar and typing errors in the document, the student should paid more attention when finalizing the document. In addition, certain sections are quite difficult to understand and follow due to complicated structure of sentences.
Moreover, meaning of Annex 1 and 2 is not explained in the text.
11) Questions related to the work (to be answered during the final presentation)*:
Permit the final presentation: _X_ recommended __ not-recommended Overall evaluation of the master thesis:
__ A excellent __ C good __ E sufficient
__ B very good _X_ D satisfactory __ F fail
Date: 27.5.2013 Signature:
