Faculty of Business
Administration
Master’s Thesis Evaluation by the
Title of the Master’s Thesis:
Author of the Master’s Thesis:
Goals of the Master’s Thesis:
Evaluation
Criteria Description Max.
points Points
Content 70%
Output Quality
Results are well presented, discussed - substantiated, relevant and original (i.e. novelty produ- ced by the author). They are of high practical/theoretical relevance.20
Goals
The goals of the thesis are evident and accomplished.10
Opponent
Candidate attraction and selection methods of companies
Milan Polák
The thesis is focused on the attraction and selection process and methods that are being used to select the candidates. The goal is to discover, which methods are the most widely used among the sample of CEMS students and compare them.
18
8 The goals of the thesis are generally defined, described more in a detail in
the analytical part.
The thesis is well prepared and presents the analytical view on a standard
HR process of attraction and selection of employees. It brings interesting
data about the CEMS students and their "first-employment" experience.
Criteria Description Max.
points Points
Content 70%
Methodology
Methods are adequate and used correctly in relation to pre-set goals.20
Theory/ Con-
ceptualizatio 20
Formal requirements 15%
Structure
The thesis is a consistent, well-organised logical whole.3
Terminology
Linguistic and terminological level.4
Formalities
Formal layout and requirements, extent, abstract.4
Demonstration of an in-depth understanding of the topic area (state-of-the-art) including key concepts, terminology, theories, definitions, etc. based on a literature survey. Literature review.
Theoretical part summarizes the standard approach to attraction and selection of employees. There is a confusion / fusion of terms "selection"
and "admission", even though the author cites the relevant sources. The theoretical part gives an overview of most common used methods.
The thesis is well-organized and well structured.
Linguistic and terminological level is appropriate with the exception mentioned above.
The formal requirements are met
18
15
3
3
4 Methods used are adequate and properly applied, described in detail.
Sometimes the detail of the description evokes an interpretation from the
textbook.
Criteria Description Max.
points Points
Formal requirements 15%
Citing
Quality of citations and reflection of Ephorus results.4
Delivery 15%
Presentation document
Is the presentation itself structured in a clear way? Is it appealing and easy to follow? Does it
convey the message efficiently?
5
Presentation skills
Are you conveying the message efficiently and timely? Do you use appropriate words, speed, tone of voice, gestures, movement etc. to express your thoughts in a clear manner?
