• Nebyly nalezeny žádné výsledky

Veřejná příloha490_xnovm75.pdf, 1.2 MB Stáhnout

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Podíl "Veřejná příloha490_xnovm75.pdf, 1.2 MB Stáhnout"

Copied!
429
0
0

Načítání.... (zobrazit plný text nyní)

Fulltext

(1)

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

C111 * C112 C111 * C113 C111 * C114 C111 * C115 C111 * C141 C111 * C142 C111 * C143 C111 * C144 C111 * C145 C111 * C146 C111 * C161 C111 * C162 C111 * C163 C111 * C164 C111 * C165 C111 * C166 C111 * C191 C111 * C192 C111 * C193 C111 * C194 C111 * C221 C111 * C222 C111 * C223 C111 * C23

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Valid Missing Total

Cases

C111 * C112

Crosstab Count

81 24 105

82 13 95

163 37 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C112

Total

(2)

.012 .014

.010 .012

.015 .017

Symmetric C111 Dependent C112 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

(3)

Directional Measures

.851 .093c

.851 .093c

.851 .093c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C112 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.118 .095

.118 .095

.117 .095

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C113

Crosstab Count

104 1 105

91 4 95

195 5 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C113

Total

Directional Measures

.014 .018

.008 .010

.049 .058

Symmetric C111 Dependent C113 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(4)

.798 .130c

.798 .130c

.798 .130c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C113 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.104 .141

.104 .141

.104 .141

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C114

Crosstab Count

57 48 105

78 17 95

135 65 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C114

Total

Directional Measures

.069 .031

.066 .030

.072 .032

Symmetric C111 Dependent C114 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(5)

Directional Measures

2.210 .000c 2.210 .000c 2.210 .000c Symmetric

C111 Dependent C114 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.297 .000

.297 .000

.284 .000

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C115

Crosstab Count

53 52 105

72 23 95

125 75 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C115

Total

Directional Measures

.051 .027

.050 .026

.053 .027

Symmetric C111 Dependent C115 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(6)

1.909 .000c 1.909 .000c 1.909 .000c Symmetric

C111 Dependent C115 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.261 .000

.261 .000

.253 .000

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C141

Crosstab Count

53 52 105

62 33 95

115 85 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C141

Total

Directional Measures

.016 .015

.016 .015

.016 .015

Symmetric C111 Dependent C141 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(7)

Directional Measures

1.066 .034c 1.066 .034c 1.066 .034c Symmetric

C111 Dependent C141 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.149 .035

.149 .035

.148 .035

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C142

Crosstab Count

93 12 105

77 18 95

170 30 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C142

Total

Directional Measures

.010 .013

.008 .011

.013 .017

Symmetric C111 Dependent C142 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(8)

.748 .137c

.748 .137c

.748 .137c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C142 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.105 .137

.105 .137

.105 .137

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C143

Crosstab Count

90 15 105

75 20 95

165 35 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C143

Total

Directional Measures

.007 .011

.006 .009

.009 .013

Symmetric C111 Dependent C143 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(9)

Directional Measures

.630 .208c

.630 .208c

.630 .208c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C143 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.089 .208

.089 .208

.089 .208

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C144

Crosstab Count

66 39 105

49 46 95

115 85 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C144

Total

Directional Measures

.009 .012

.009 .012

.010 .012

Symmetric C111 Dependent C144 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(10)

.808 .107c

.808 .107c

.808 .107c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C144 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.114 .107

.114 .107

.113 .107

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C145

Crosstab Count

84 21 105

63 32 95

147 53 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C145

Total

Directional Measures

.019 .017

.017 .016

.021 .019

Symmetric C111 Dependent C145 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(11)

Directional Measures

1.104 .028c 1.104 .028c 1.104 .028c Symmetric

C111 Dependent C145 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.155 .029

.155 .029

.153 .029

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C146

Crosstab Count

103 2 105

95 95

198 2 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C146

Total

Directional Measures

.017 .012

.009 .007

.116 .019

Symmetric C111 Dependent C146 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(12)

1.416 .107c 1.416 .107c 1.416 .107c Symmetric

C111 Dependent C146 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.096 .176

.096 .176

.095 .176

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C161

Crosstab Count

78 27 105

69 26 95

147 53 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C161

Total

Directional Measures

.000 .002

.000 .002

.000 .002

Symmetric C111 Dependent C161 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(13)

Directional Measures

.132 .791c

.132 .791c

.132 .791c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C161 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.019 .791

.019 .791

.019 .791

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C162

Crosstab Count

79 26 105

55 40 95

134 66 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C162

Total

Directional Measures

.026 .019

.025 .019

.027 .020

Symmetric C111 Dependent C162 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(14)

1.316 .009c 1.316 .009c 1.316 .009c Symmetric

C111 Dependent C162 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.184 .009

.184 .009

.181 .009

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C163

Crosstab Count

88 17 105

74 21 95

162 38 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C163

Total

Directional Measures

.005 .009

.004 .008

.006 .011

Symmetric C111 Dependent C163 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(15)

Directional Measures

.533 .287c

.533 .287c

.533 .287c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C163 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.075 .287

.075 .287

.075 .287

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C164

Crosstab Count

104 1 105

94 1 95

198 2 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C164

Total

Directional Measures

.000 .001

.000 .001

.000 .006

Symmetric C111 Dependent C164 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(16)

.036 .943c

.036 .943c

.036 .943c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C164 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.005 .943

.005 .943

.005 .943

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C165

Crosstab Count

98 7 105

85 10 95

183 17 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C165

Total

Directional Measures

.005 .010

.003 .007

.008 .017

Symmetric C111 Dependent C165 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(17)

Directional Measures

.490 .328c

.490 .328c

.490 .328c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C165 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.069 .328

.069 .328

.069 .328

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C166

Crosstab Count

63 42 105

71 24 95

134 66 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C166

Total

Directional Measures

.019 .017

.018 .016

.020 .017

Symmetric C111 Dependent C166 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(18)

1.124 .026c 1.124 .026c 1.124 .026c Symmetric

C111 Dependent C166 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.157 .027

.157 .027

.155 .027

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C191

Crosstab Count

87 18 105

64 31 95

151 49 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C191

Total

Directional Measures

.026 .020

.024 .018

.029 .023

Symmetric C111 Dependent C191 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(19)

Directional Measures

1.289 .011c 1.289 .011c 1.289 .011c Symmetric

C111 Dependent C191 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.180 .011

.180 .011

.177 .011

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C192

Crosstab Count

67 38 105

71 24 95

138 62 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C192

Total

Directional Measures

.011 .013

.010 .012

.011 .013

Symmetric C111 Dependent C192 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(20)

.843 .094c

.843 .094c

.843 .094c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C192 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.118 .095

.118 .095

.117 .095

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C193

Crosstab Count

56 49 105

56 39 95

112 88 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C193

Total

Directional Measures

.002 .006

.002 .006

.002 .006

Symmetric C111 Dependent C193 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(21)

Directional Measures

.400 .424c

.400 .424c

.400 .424c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C193 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.056 .424

.056 .424

.056 .424

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C194

Crosstab Count

105 105

94 1 95

199 1 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C194

Total

Directional Measures

.010 .010

.005 .005

.119 .022

Symmetric C111 Dependent C194 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(22)

1.001 .222c 1.001 .222c 1.001 .222c Symmetric

C111 Dependent C194 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.075 .292

.075 .292

.074 .292

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C221

Crosstab Count

50 55 105

35 60 95

85 115 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C221

Total

Directional Measures

.009 .011

.009 .011

.009 .011

Symmetric C111 Dependent C221 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(23)

Directional Measures

.774 .123c

.774 .123c

.774 .123c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C221 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.109 .124

.109 .124

.108 .124

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C222

Crosstab Count

87 18 105

86 9 95

173 27 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C222

Total

Directional Measures

.012 .014

.009 .011

.016 .020

Symmetric C111 Dependent C222 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(24)

.813 .109c

.813 .109c

.813 .109c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C222 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.112 .113

.112 .113

.111 .113

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C223

Crosstab Count

74 31 105

71 24 95

145 55 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C223

Total

Directional Measures

.002 .005

.002 .005

.002 .006

Symmetric C111 Dependent C223 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(25)

Directional Measures

.338 .500c

.338 .500c

.338 .500c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C223 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.048 .500

.048 .500

.048 .500

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C111 * C23

Crosstab Count

60 45 105

46 49 95

106 94 200

.00 1.00 C111 Total

.00 1.00

C23

Total

Directional Measures

.006 .009

.006 .009

.006 .009

Symmetric C111 Dependent C23 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(26)

.618 .217c

.618 .217c

.618 .217c

Symmetric C111 Dependent C23 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.087 .217

.087 .217

.087 .217

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

C112 * C113 C112 * C114 C112 * C115 C112 * C141 C112 * C142 C112 * C143 C112 * C144 C112 * C145 C112 * C146 C112 * C161 C112 * C162 C112 * C163 C112 * C164 C112 * C165 C112 * C166 C112 * C191 C112 * C192 C112 * C193 C112 * C194 C112 * C221 C112 * C222 C112 * C223 C112 * C23

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Valid Missing Total

Cases

C112 * C113

(27)

Crosstab Count

161 2 163

34 3 37

195 5 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C113

Total

Directional Measures

.037 .038

.023 .024

.093 .090

Symmetric C112 Dependent C113 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(28)

.948 .037c

.948 .037c

.948 .037c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C113 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.171 .016

.171 .016

.169 .016

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C114

Crosstab Count

106 57 163

29 8 37

135 65 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C114

Total

Directional Measures

.012 .014

.014 .016

.010 .012

Symmetric C112 Dependent C114 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(29)

Directional Measures

.833 .107c

.833 .107c

.833 .107c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C114 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.111 .118

.111 .118

.110 .118

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C115

Crosstab Count

98 65 163

27 10 37

125 75 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C115

Total

Directional Measures

.010 .013

.012 .015

.008 .011

Symmetric C112 Dependent C115 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(30)

.760 .138c

.760 .138c

.760 .138c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C115 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.103 .145

.103 .145

.103 .145

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C141

Crosstab Count

91 72 163

24 13 37

115 85 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C141

Total

Directional Measures

.004 .009

.005 .010

.004 .007

Symmetric C112 Dependent C141 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(31)

Directional Measures

.510 .312c

.510 .312c

.510 .312c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C141 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.071 .315

.071 .315

.071 .315

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C142

Crosstab Count

139 24 163

31 6 37

170 30 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C142

Total

Directional Measures

.000 .003

.000 .002

.000 .003

Symmetric C112 Dependent C142 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(32)

.113 .820c

.113 .820c

.113 .820c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C142 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.016 .818

.016 .818

.016 .818

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C143

Crosstab Count

134 29 163

31 6 37

165 35 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C143

Total

Directional Measures

.000 .002

.000 .002

.000 .002

Symmetric C112 Dependent C143 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(33)

Directional Measures

.116 .819c

.116 .819c

.116 .819c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C143 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.016 .820

.016 .820

.016 .820

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C144

Crosstab Count

96 67 163

19 18 37

115 85 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C144

Total

Directional Measures

.003 .007

.004 .009

.003 .006

Symmetric C112 Dependent C144 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(34)

.416 .404c

.416 .404c

.416 .404c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C144 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.059 .402

.059 .402

.059 .402

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C145

Crosstab Count

125 38 163

22 15 37

147 53 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C145

Total

Directional Measures

.020 .020

.022 .022

.019 .018

Symmetric C112 Dependent C145 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(35)

Directional Measures

1.011 .038c 1.011 .038c 1.011 .038c Symmetric

C112 Dependent C145 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.152 .032

.152 .032

.150 .032

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C146

Crosstab Count

161 2 163

37 37

198 2 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C146

Total

Directional Measures

.008 .005

.004 .003

.037 .008

Symmetric C112 Dependent C146 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(36)

1.391 .364c 1.391 .364c 1.391 .364c Symmetric

C112 Dependent C146 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.048 .498

.048 .498

.048 .498

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C161

Crosstab Count

119 44 163

28 9 37

147 53 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C161

Total

Directional Measures

.001 .003

.001 .003

.000 .003

Symmetric C112 Dependent C161 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(37)

Directional Measures

.168 .738c

.168 .738c

.168 .738c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C161 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.023 .740

.023 .740

.023 .740

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C162

Crosstab Count

112 51 163

22 15 37

134 66 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C162

Total

Directional Measures

.005 .010

.006 .011

.004 .009

Symmetric C112 Dependent C162 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(38)

.528 .286c

.528 .286c

.528 .286c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C162 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.076 .280

.076 .280

.076 .280

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C163

Crosstab Count

134 29 163

28 9 37

162 38 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C163

Total

Directional Measures

.004 .009

.004 .010

.004 .009

Symmetric C112 Dependent C163 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(39)

Directional Measures

.436 .372c

.436 .372c

.436 .372c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C163 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.065 .360

.065 .360

.065 .360

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C164

Crosstab Count

163 163

35 2 37

198 2 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C164

Total

Directional Measures

.064 .041

.036 .025

.305 .045

Symmetric C112 Dependent C164 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(40)

1.429 .009c 1.429 .009c 1.429 .009c Symmetric

C112 Dependent C164 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.211 .003

.211 .003

.206 .003

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C165

Crosstab Count

150 13 163

33 4 37

183 17 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C165

Total

Directional Measures

.002 .007

.002 .006

.003 .010

Symmetric C112 Dependent C165 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(41)

Directional Measures

.264 .587c

.264 .587c

.264 .587c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C165 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.039 .577

.039 .577

.039 .577

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C166

Crosstab Count

108 55 163

26 11 37

134 66 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C166

Total

Directional Measures

.001 .004

.001 .005

.001 .004

Symmetric C112 Dependent C166 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(42)

.238 .637c

.238 .637c

.238 .637c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C166 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.033 .639

.033 .639

.033 .639

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C191

Crosstab Count

125 38 163

26 11 37

151 49 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C191

Total

Directional Measures

.003 .008

.003 .009

.003 .007

Symmetric C112 Dependent C191 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(43)

Directional Measures

.397 .420c

.397 .420c

.397 .420c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C191 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.058 .413

.058 .413

.058 .413

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C192

Crosstab Count

112 51 163

26 11 37

138 62 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C192

Total

Directional Measures

.000 .002

.000 .002

.000 .001

Symmetric C112 Dependent C192 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(44)

.093 .853c

.093 .853c

.093 .853c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C192 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.013 .853

.013 .853

.013 .853

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C193

Crosstab Count

90 73 163

22 15 37

112 88 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C193

Total

Directional Measures

.001 .004

.001 .005

.001 .003

Symmetric C112 Dependent C193 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(45)

Directional Measures

.236 .638c

.236 .638c

.236 .638c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C193 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.033 .639

.033 .639

.033 .639

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C194

Crosstab Count

162 1 163

37 37

199 1 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C194

Total

Directional Measures

.004 .004

.002 .002

.033 .007

Symmetric C112 Dependent C194 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(46)

.992 .522c

.992 .522c

.992 .522c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C194 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.034 .633

.034 .633

.034 .633

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C221

Crosstab Count

64 99 163

21 16 37

85 115 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C221

Total

Directional Measures

.016 .017

.019 .020

.014 .014

Symmetric C112 Dependent C221 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(47)

Directional Measures

.966 .053c

.966 .053c

.966 .053c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C221 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.137 .052

.137 .052

.136 .052

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C222

Crosstab Count

143 20 163

30 7 37

173 27 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C222

Total

Directional Measures

.006 .012

.006 .011

.007 .013

Symmetric C112 Dependent C222 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(48)

.498 .303c

.498 .303c

.498 .303c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C222 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.076 .285

.076 .285

.075 .285

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C223

Crosstab Count

121 42 163

24 13 37

145 55 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C223

Total

Directional Measures

.006 .011

.007 .012

.005 .010

Symmetric C112 Dependent C223 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(49)

Directional Measures

.556 .258c

.556 .258c

.556 .258c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C223 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.081 .249

.081 .249

.081 .249

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C112 * C23

Crosstab Count

86 77 163

20 17 37

106 94 200

.00 1.00 C112 Total

.00 1.00

C23

Total

Directional Measures

.000 .001

.000 .001

.000 .001

Symmetric C112 Dependent C23 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(50)

.071 .887c

.071 .887c

.071 .887c

Symmetric C112 Dependent C23 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.010 .887

.010 .887

.010 .887

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%

C113 * C114 C113 * C115 C113 * C141 C113 * C142 C113 * C143 C113 * C144 C113 * C145 C113 * C146 C113 * C161 C113 * C162 C113 * C163 C113 * C164 C113 * C165 C113 * C166 C113 * C191 C113 * C192 C113 * C193 C113 * C194 C113 * C221 C113 * C222 C113 * C223 C113 * C23

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Valid Missing Total

Cases

C113 * C114

(51)

Crosstab Count

133 62 195

2 3 5

135 65 200

.00 1.00 C113 Total

.00 1.00

C114

Total

Directional Measures

.011 .017

.035 .054

.006 .010

Symmetric C113 Dependent C114 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(52)

.622 .202c

.622 .202c

.622 .202c

Symmetric C113 Dependent C114 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.094 .184

.094 .184

.094 .184

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C113 * C115

Crosstab Count

123 72 195

2 3 5

125 75 200

.00 1.00 C113 Total

.00 1.00

C115

Total

Directional Measures

.007 .013

.023 .044

.004 .008

Symmetric C113 Dependent C115 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(53)

Directional Measures

.510 .303c

.510 .303c

.510 .303c

Symmetric C113 Dependent C115 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.074 .293

.074 .293

.074 .293

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C113 * C141

Crosstab Count

111 84 195

4 1 5

115 85 200

.00 1.00 C113 Total

.00 1.00

C141

Total

Directional Measures

.007 .013

.025 .042

.004 .007

Symmetric C113 Dependent C141 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(54)

.572 .281c

.572 .281c

.572 .281c

Symmetric C113 Dependent C141 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

-.073 .303

.073 .303

.073 .303

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C113 * C142

Crosstab Count

167 28 195

3 2 5

170 30 200

.00 1.00 C113 Total

.00 1.00

C142

Total

Directional Measures

.018 .028

.041 .063

.011 .018

Symmetric C113 Dependent C142 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(55)

Directional Measures

.619 .168c

.619 .168c

.619 .168c

Symmetric C113 Dependent C142 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.112 .113

.112 .113

.111 .113

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C113 * C143

Crosstab Count

162 33 195

3 2 5

165 35 200

.00 1.00 C113 Total

.00 1.00

C143

Total

Directional Measures

.012 .022

.031 .054

.008 .014

Symmetric C113 Dependent C143 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

(56)

.551 .230c

.551 .230c

.551 .230c

Symmetric C113 Dependent C143 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

c.

Symmetric Measures

.095 .180

.095 .180

.094 .180

200 Phi

Cramer's V

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by

Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Value

Approx.

Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

C113 * C144

Crosstab Count

112 83 195

3 2 5

115 85 200

.00 1.00 C113 Total

.00 1.00

C144

Total

Directional Measures

.000 .001

.000 .005

.000 .001

Symmetric C113 Dependent C144 Dependent Uncertainty Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal

Value

Asymp.

Std. Errora

Odkazy

Související dokumenty

Based on the results of the Chi-Square Test we can state that in the segment of the university students the preference of branded or non-branded goods is independent on the gender

The above-mentioned metric PPR complements the ratio of quadrates of the primary peak height and the root mean square of all peak heights, known as Peak to root mean square

The research investigated 5 hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: mothers of infants are not informed on the "infant swimming" - confirmed; Hypothesis 2: mothers do not get their initial

Chi- square method and a cluster analysis were then applied to the output data in order to find the answer to the fundamental question – what locations are involved

1) By using molecular markers to reveal phylogeography of the EGS and to test the hypothesis of continental cryptic refugia for this steppic taxon in Europe. 2) To collect

It was found in (4) (see Theorem 3.5.2) that for finite moments s ≥ 1 the entropy coding error is related to the asymptotic behavior of the small ball function of the Gaussian

Assuming the asymptotic FGM form of the joint density functions and selected parametric forms of the marginal densities g T (shape factor) and of the tail of g (spheroid size),

The large cardinal axioms used to establish the consistency of Martin’s Maximum are far stronger than the large cardinal axioms used to prove Projective Determinacy. It