• Nebyly nalezeny žádné výsledky

BUDGET AND REDISTRIBUTION IN THE EU

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Podíl "BUDGET AND REDISTRIBUTION IN THE EU"

Copied!
33
0
0

Načítání.... (zobrazit plný text nyní)

Fulltext

(1)

1

Lecture 8, Topic A

BUDGET AND REDISTRIBUTION IN THE EU

Dr. Wadim Strielkowski IES FSV CUNI

November 18, 2013

(2)

Synopsis

Budget of the EU. Why joint budget: transaction costs and redistribution of costs and benefits. Structure of revenues and expenditures. Who decides? Net contributors and net beneficiaries.

Common agricultural policy (CAP): objectives, forms, problems. Economic arguments for a special treatment of agricultural sector. Instruments of CAP, welfare analysis.

Criticisms and reforms.

Reading:

Svendsen G. T. (2003), The Political Economy of the European Union, Institutions, Policy and Economic Growth. Edward Edgar,

Cheltenhan. Chapter 3, pp. 58-68.

(3)

3

Transaction costs

Gains and costs of integration

Compensation asymmetric shocks

Redistribution of costs and benefits - common agricultural policy - regional redistribution

common policies (R&D, environmental protection, fishing)

Optimal currency area: redistribution is one of conditions of smooth functioning

Redistributive functions of the budget of EU

WHY DOES REDISTRIBUTION HAPPEN IN EU?

(4)

AGGRESSIVE AND TOLERANT INTEGRATION MODELS

Different arrangements of international economic relations might have different effects on different national economies and their regions and different sectors of each national economy

For example in our simple model of a customs union the

customs union of countries 1 and 2 increases total welfare of

both countries, but while country 2 is gaining, country 1 is

losing (such situation is expressed in Fig. 8.1). A rationality of

establishing the customs union is based on the fact, that the gain

of country 2 exceeds decline of welfare in country 1.

(5)

5

Fig. 8.1, Gains and losses in customs union

(6)

In aggressive models those who are benefiting from international economic cooperation are not sharing their gains with those who are loosing.

In tolerant models we can observe willingness to share benefits to motivate by economic instruments mutual cooperation.

European Union uses a tolerant method of economic

integration.

(7)

7

BUDGET OF THE EU

The European Union (EU) has an independent

parliament (EP) and civil service which is distinct from those of the 27 member states.

It administers common laws between the Member States and expenditure on common policies

throughout the EU.

Peculiarities of the EU budget:

– Democratic control – No taxes

– CAP

– UK rebate

(8)

EU budget in numbers

EU has an agreed budget of €116 billion for the year 2007, and €862 billion for the period 2007-2013.

For comparison, the UK expenditure for 2004 alone was estimated at about €759 billion (Czech budget about 35 billion).

For comparison:

– just over 1 percent of EU GNI

– Small relative to national budgets (40-50 percent)

– 0.70 Euro per day per person

(9)

9

History of EU budget

(10)

Budgetary crisis

• Until late 1970s: the ‘De Gaulle Budget’ reflecting strong French agricultural interests

1980 and 1984-88 budgets rejected:

• 1. Spending beyond limits of own resources (CAP 70% of budget)

• 2. EP dissatisfied with power to only control part of the budget

• 3. Size of UK Budgetary contribution

Solution:

• Inter-institutional agreements

• budget reforms

• financial frameworks

• UK rebate = equivalent to 66 % of its contributions

(11)

11

• The rebate is calculated as approximately 2/3 of the amount by which UK payments into the EU exceed EU expenditure returning to the UK

• Budget dispute started with accession

negotiations: UK felt disadvantaged by CAP

• (Britain was the third poorest country in the EC)

• ‘Correcting mechanism’ demanded (1974) but not implemented

• Britain’s net-payment in the 1970s: £60m (until 1976), £369m (1977), £822m (1978), £947m (1979)

• 1984: British rebate settled at 66%

• 2005: Britain is the third wealthiest EU country (rebate at about £3b/year)

• 50% of the rebate is being paid by Italy and France

The British (UK) rebate

+

(12)

1988 and 1993 budget reforms

• Delors packages I and II

• EU budget maximum linked to 1.2% of EU GNI (since 1993: 1.27%;

2005: 1.24%)

• National contribution linked to GNI

• Attempts to limit then reduce CAP spending

• Agreement to doubling of structural funds

GNI=GDP + net income from other countries

GDP = consumption + investment + government spending + (exports − imports)

(13)

13

1999 budget reforms (Agenda 2000)

• Stabilisation of total expenditure

• CAP spending only marginally increased

• Decrease in structural fund spending

• UK rebate untouched

Agenda 2000 - Action programme of the European Union with objectives to

reform CAP and Regional policy, and establish a new financial framework for the years 2000-06 with a view to the then upcoming Enlargement.

Main goals:

• To update the European Model of Agriculture

• To narrow the gaps in wealth and economic prospects between regions

• To honour priorities while enjoying only very modest increases in budget income until 2006

The reforms were first outlined in the documents with the title "Agenda 2000"

published by the Commission in July 1997. Reforms were finally agreed by the 15 EU countries at the European Council meeting in Berlin in March 1999.

Detailed legislation was later drafted and agreed to by all of the EU institutions.

(14)

BUDGET REVENUES

Where does the money come from?

The European Union has its own resources to finance its expenditure. Legally, these resources belong to the

Union. Member States collect them on behalf of the EU and transfer them to the EU budget (EU budgetary

agreement 1971)

Own resources are of three kinds:

- traditional own resources (TOR) - part of value added tax (VAT)

- resources based on grass national income of

member states (GNI)

(15)

15

1. Traditional own resources (TOR)

consist mainly of duties that are charged on imports of products coming from a non-EU state

they bring in approximately EUR 17,3 billion or 15 % of the total revenue

(the figures here and below refer to the forecasts for

2007, source European Commission web page).

(16)

2. The resource based on value added tax (VAT) a uniform percentage rate that is applied to each Member State’s harmonized VAT revenue

The VAT-based resource accounts for 15 % of total revenue, or some EUR 17.8 billion.

3. The resource based on gross national income (GNI) a uniform percentage rate (0.73 %) applied to the GNI of each Member State

the largest source of revenue, accounts for 69 % of total

revenue or EUR 80 billion

(17)

17

4. Other revenue

such as

- taxes paid by EU staff on their salaries

- contributions from non-EU countries to certain EU programmes

- fines on companies that are breaking competition or other laws

These miscellaneous resources add up to around EUR

1.3 billion, i.e. about 1 % of the budget.

(18)

Budget revenues at a glance

(19)

19

BUDGET EXPENDITURES 2007

1. Natural resources 43%

Common agricultural policy Rural development

Environmental protection

2. Cohesion policy 36%

Regional redistribution Cohesion funds

3. Competitiveness and growth 8%

Employment and social services Support of research

Information society

(20)

4. Foreign aid and other extension 6%

Cooperation with new candidate states

Long term assistance to underdeveloped countries Emergency aid in natural disasters

5. Security and justice 1%

Fight against terrorism

Cooperation in criminal and judicial matters

6. European citizenship 1%

Cultural heritage Public health

Consumers protection

7. Administrative costs 5%

EU institutions

EU foreign service

(21)

21

EU expenditures

Compulsory (46%) CAP

Non-compulsory (54%)

- Structural funds - Internal policies - External policies - Administration - Pre-accession aid

35 267 2624 4937 12190 25817

41804

59369

96238 111424 129100

0 50000 100000 150000

1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1991 2001 2006 2008

Growth of EU budget over years

(22)

Example of the budget year 2005

(23)

23

Budget for the 2007

(24)

EU net budget 2007-2013 per capita

10000 EUR plus PP

-5000 – 1000 EUR PP

(25)

25

BUDGETARY RULES

- The treaties: the Union budget is not allowed to be in deficit, which means that revenue has to cover the entire expenditure.

- A maximum spending limit is currently set at 1.24 % of the Union's gross national income (GNI) for

payments made from the EU budget. This corresponds to approximately EUR 293 per EU citizen on average.

- A financial framework agreed by the European

Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission, which controls the evolution of the EU

budget by expenditure category over a set period of

time.

(26)

HOW THE BUDGET IS DECIDED

There are two types of budget expenditure: compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure. Compulsory

expenditure covers all expenditure resulting from

international agreements and the EU treaties. All other expenditure is classified as non-compulsory.

The Council of Ministers has the final word on

compulsory expenditure and the European Parliament

on non-compulsory expenditure.

(27)

27

THE BUDGET PROCEDURE

Preliminary draft of the budget by Commission Council – first reading, amendments

Parliament – first reading, with amendments

Council – second reading, tries reach agreement with Parliament

Parliament – second reading, finally approves or rejects non compulsory expenditure

The most recent financial frameworks cover the seven-

year period from 2007 to 2013

(28)

EP COM CoM ECJ ECA

proposal

preliminary draft

draft Commission

Council

EP

Council EP

compulsory expenditure

non- compulsory expenditure first reading

Council has last word

EP has last word

amended draft

constant dialogue between the Council

and the EP

no:

emergency budget adopted after

second reading? yes

final publication in

Official Journal

The budget procedure

(29)

29

Redistribution

Net contributors, paying more than getting

Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Luxembourg

All other countries – net receivers, getting more than paying

Expenditure in Luxembourg, Belgium and France

include items for the EU administrative centers in each

of those countries.

(30)

Budget 2006, member states contribution and expenditure

Member State

Total Contribution

in Euro

Total Contribution

as % of total EU budget

Total Expenditure

year 2006 in Euro

Total Expenditure

as % of total EU budget

European

Union 105 259 468 772 100.00% 106 575 500 000 100.00%

Germany 22 218 438 941 21.11% 12 242 400 000 11.49%

France 17 303 107 859 16.44% 13 496 200 000 12.66%

Italy 14 359 479 157 13.64% 10 922 300 000 10.25%

United

Kingdom 13 739 900 046 13.05% 8 294 200 000 7.78%

Spain 8 957 286 488 8.51% 12 883 000 000 12.09%

Netherlands 5 552 933 781 5.28% 2 190 400 000 2.06%

Belgium 4 035 286 807 3.83% 5 625 100 000 5.28%

Sweden 2 832 862 800 2.69% 1 573 400 000 1.48%

Austria 2 308 432 030 2.19% 1 830 100 000 1.72%

Denmark 2 130 860 212 2.02% 1 501 900 000 1.41%

Poland 2 099 087 114 1.99% 5 305 600 000 4.98%

(31)

31 Member State

Total Contribution

in Euro

Total Contribution

as % of total EU budget

Total Expenditure

year 2006 in Euro

Total Expenditure

as % of total EU budget

Greece 1 882 611 879 1.79% 6 833 700 000 6.41%

Finland 1 544 832 284 1.47% 1 280 400 000 1.20%

Portugal 1 443 049 602 1.37% 3 634 800 000 3.41%

Ireland 1 341 281 313 1.27% 2 461 800 000 2.31%

Hungary 1 003 119 411 0.95% 1 842 200 000 1.73%

Czech

Republic 932 392 859 0.89% 1 330 000 000 1.25%

Slovakia 393 148 777 0.37% 696 200 000 0.65%

Slovenia 299 993 572 0.29% 406 000 000 0.38%

Luxembourg 241 439 011 0.23% 1 194 800 000 1.12%

Lithuania 221 997 405 0.21% 799 800 000 0.75%

Cyprus 144 556 416 0.14% 239 600 000 0.22%

Latvia 115 205 431 0.11% 402 600 000 0.24%

Estonia 100 756 308 0.10% 300 000 000 0.28%

Malta 57 409 269 0.05% 157 000 000 0.14%

Bulgaria 360 600 000 0.34%

Romania 693 100 000 0.65%

(32)

32

Member State Money to EU

(billions)

Money from EU (billions)

Net benefit (billions)

Ratio of money (Out/In)

Population

(2007) Net benefit per capita

Austria 19 10 -8.5 0.526 8,298,923 -1024

Belgium 33 39 +6.4 1.182 10,584,534 605

Bulgaria 2.3 12 +9.7 5.218 7,679,290 1263

Cyprus 1.1 1 -0.1 0.909 778,684 -128

Czech Republic 9.2 31 +22 3.370 10,287,189 2139

Denmark 17 10 -7.2 0.588 5,444,242 -1322

Estonia 0.8 4 +3.2 5.0 1,342,409 2384

Finland 13 9 -3.7 0.692 5,276,955 -701

France 140 89 -51 0.636 63,392,140 -805

Germany 164 78 -86 0.476 82,314,906 -1045

Greece 15 40 +25 2.667 11,171,740 2238

Hungary 8.4 32 +24 3.810 10,066,158 2384

Republic of Ireland 11 12 +0.6 1.091 4,312,526 139

Italy 116 70 -46 0.603 59,131,287 -778

Latvia 1.4 6 +4.6 4.286 2,281,305 2016

Lithuania 1.7 9 +7.3 5.294 3,384,879 2157

Luxembourg 2.3 10 +7.7 4.348 476,187 16170

Malta 0.5 1 +0.5 2.0 407,810 1226

Netherlands 37 13 -24 0.351 16,357,992 -1467

Poland 22 87 +65 3.955 38,125,479 1705

Portugal 12 29 +17 2.417 10,599,095 1604

Romania 7.2 32 +25 4.444 21,565,119 1159

Slovakia 3.5 14 +11 4.00 5,393,637 2039

Slovenia 3.1 6 +2.9 1.9354 2,010,377 1443

Spain 76 78 +22 1.026 44,474,631 49

Sweden 20 9 -11 0.450 9,113,257 -1207

Estimates for EU-27 budget for 2007-2013 in euros (€)

(33)

33

Questions?

Odkazy

Související dokumenty

The countries chosen have also exerted clear influence on the social policy of other countries, and have played the role of pace-setters or benchmarks in various stages of

While analysing criteria of separating the autonomy of the customs law, customs law regulations stipulated concepts and phrases established especially for the needs of this

With the aim of promoting democratization reforms in candidate countries and improvement in the Copenhagen political criteria, the European Union has exerted pressure into

Hungary and Poland also regret the fact that the European Union tries to pressure both countries with the idea of conditionality of European funds to force both

Mohlo by se zdát, že tím, že muži s nízkým vzděláním nereagují na sňatkovou tíseň zvýšenou homogamíí, mnoho neztratí, protože zatímco se u žen pravděpodobnost vstupu

Figure 2: From Harris and Ross [1955]: Schematic diagram of the railway network of the Western Soviet Union and Eastern European countries, with a maximum flow of value 163,000

Union 1954, Fouchet I and II 1961/2, Common Foreign and Security policy included in Treaty of European Union 1992)..  In 1998 meeting of British and French governments – agreement on

equilibrium in country H as in the case of customs union with P: the same domestic supply, domestic demand and import, but import now will come from the world market instead of